Study to compare the efficacy of C-MAC video laryngoscope with conventional direct laryngoscope using miller's blade 0 for neonatal intubation at tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Yogita Karemore , Saurabh Rokde , Shubham Shende , Vaibhav Solanke , Vrishali Ankalwar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48047/

Keywords:

C-MAC video laryngoscope, Direct Laryngoscope, neonatal intubation, neonatal anaesthesia

Abstract

Airway management in neonates is a major challenge for pediatric anesthesiologists. Neonates allow a very short apnea time during induction of anesthesia; therefore, intubation should be quickly achieved within this narrow safety period. Present study was aimed to
compare the efficacy of C-MAC video laryngoscope with conventional direct laryngoscope using miller's blade 0 for neonatal intubation at tertiary care hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, comparative study, conducted in term/ Late preterm neonates, weighing more than 1500 gms, undergoing elective and emergency surgeries. Neonates were randomized into two groups (45 in each group) as Group C-MAC & Group DL. Results: In present study, mean postnatal age, Gender-wise distribution, mean gestational age & mean birth weight in both groups was comparable. Mean duration of successful laryngoscopy with C-MAC was (16.6 ± 4.85 sec) less than direct laryngoscope (28.11 ± 6.82 sec), difference was statistically significant (P-value: <0.0001). Majority neonates in group C-MAC showed CL grade I, and grade II (35.56% each), whereas in group DL, majority neonates showed CL grade I (75.56%), difference was statistically significant (P-value: <0.0001). Laryngoscopy in the first attempt was successful in 93.33% of neonates using C-MAC VL whereas using DL, the laryngoscopy was successful in the first attempt in 66.67% of neonates. difference was statistically significant (P-value: 0.016). Majority neonates were intubated in the first attempt in group C-MAC (90.11%) as compared to group DL (64.4%), difference was statistically significant (P-value: 0.009). The adverse events like bradycardia episodes, oesophageal intubations, gastric distention were more with group DL as compared to group C-MAC, though it is not statistically significant (p-value: >0.05)
Conclusion: C-MAC video laryngoscope is found to be superior to Conventional Direct Laryngoscope for neonatal intubation in terms of lesser intubation time, the higher firstattempt success rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-06