Efficacy and Safety of the I-Gel Versus Cuffed Tracheal Tube in Prolonged Pressure-Controlled Ventilation

Abstract

Background: In prolonged pressure-controlled ventilation, the choice between the i-gel supraglottic airway device and cuffed tracheal tube remains debated regarding efficacy and safety. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the i-gel versus cuffed tracheal tube in prolonged pressure-controlled ventilation. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted among 200 adult patients requiring prolonged pressure-controlled ventilation. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the i-gel group (n=100) and the cuffed tracheal tube group (n=100). Efficacy was assessed through airway sealing pressure, ventilatory parameters, and incidence of airway-related complications. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of complications such as aspiration, laryngopharyngeal injury, and post-extubation airway obstruction