Abstract

Male circumcision (mc) was among the first surgeries done by mankind. This method has the ability to reduce the risk of sexually transmitted illnesses such human papillomavirus (HPV), genital ulcer disease, and HIV infection. The Problems such as haemorrhage, edoema, and poor cosmetic outcomes remain prevalent in individuals who have traditional mc. Furthermore, traditional mc is time-consuming Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical results of adult male circumcision using a circular stapler to traditional methods. Primary and secondary outcomes were used to conduct a comparative assessment. Methods: We used a comparative randomised control to examine numerous characteristics and results of male circumcision using a circular stapler vs traditional male circumcision in adults in Central India. The surgical time, pain score, blood loss volume, healing time, treatment expenses, and postoperative complications were compared in the two groups.

Description