ISSN 0975-3583
 

Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research



    EFFECT OF AEROBIC TRAINING AND STRENGTH ENDURANCE TRAINING ON SELECTED PHYSICAL VARIABLES AMONG FOOTBALL PLAYERS


    Mini Thomas
    JCDR. 2017: 434-439

    Abstract

    The primary goal of training is to encourage biological adaptation in order to enhance performance in a particular task. Certain training and loading must be done in order to hasten physiological progress and change. The body goes through a number of training changes that boost efficiency when a person exercises at a level that is near to normal. At different levels, different training methods are employed to improve different facets of physical and motor fitness. This study is to find out effect of aerobic endurance training and strength endurance training on selected physical, physiological and anthropometric variables among football players for this research purpose of the study a total sixty football players were selected from football academy of Ernakulum, Kerala. the ages of the participants ranged from 17 to 21 years and were selected by random sampling method. the participants have a good record for participation in physical education and sports activities. the medical history of the participants was also investigated and medical fitness certificate was obtained from medical practitioner. consent was also sought from parents and teacher before including the students in the study. All the participants volunteered in the study. the participants were explained about the purpose, methods and importance of the study. The ANCOVA was engaged as a statistical system in this study. The Scheffé S test was worn as a after the event test when the modified post examination means' "F" ratio was shown to be significant at the 0.05 level of confidence. aerobic endurance training and strength endurance training groups on flexibility and explosive power. It was also concluded that the aerobic training or strength endurance training result in the improvement in physical variables had significant difference when compared to the treatment at all nonintervention group.

    Description

    » PDF

    Volume & Issue

    Volume 8 Issue 4

    Keywords