Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
TO FIND THE AGREEMENT OF CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS AND RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS, IN DISTINGUISHING BENIGN AND MALIGNANT CYSTIC ABDOMINAL MASSES IN ADULTS.
Dr. Divya J, Dr. Harish K,Dr. Kishor Sagar V, Dr. Amruth V C
JCDR. 2024: 1647-1653
Abstract
Background & Methods: The aim of the study is to find agreement of clinico-radiological diagnosis with pathological diagnosis and radiological diagnosis with pathological diagnosis, in distinguishing benign and malignant cystic abdominal masses in adults. A sample size of 24 subjects with 80% power to detect kappa value of 0.6 (60% agreement between clinico-radiological diagnosis with pathological diagnosis is taken on the basis of expert opinion) between clinico-radiological diagnosis with pathological diagnosis and also radiological diagnosis with pathological diagnosis. Results: Pain in the abdomen was the predominant complaint in 67.5% cases with cystic abdominal masses; the other common complaints being weight loss (20.8%), abdominal distension and anorexia (16.2 % each). In 18.9 % i.e.7/ 37 cases the cystic abdominal mass was an incidental finding on imaging in our study. Miscellaneous complaints seen in 6/ 37cases were severe headache, loss of consciousness and palpitations (1 case); breathlessness, fatigue and palpitations (1 case); giddiness and headache in 1 case; secondary infertility in 1 case and amenorrhoea in 2 cases.
» PDF